Top 10 Digger banned for half an hour!
Well, maybe I exaggerate; perhaps it was two hours of something. I saw one of the most amazing things today; I need to share it with you.
I got a message with several URL’s pointing me to this Digg about a top Digger being banned. I made comment about how ridiculous I thought this seemed and proceeded to ask some of my contacts about it. The whole thing was so bizarre to me, but then Digg has been doing some really Coo Coo stuff lately any way.
The bottom line is, in the time it took for me to get back to see other comments I was directed to by friends the ban had been lifted. Perhaps the 42 Diggs on the submission announcing the ban had something to do with this? I must have been away for like 15 minutes and the story got 38 Diggs! Now that’s a response for you, half an hour from the time the story appears until Digg removes the ban.
Profy Buried With Others
Given the issues with every story anyone submits from our blog being buried systematically, you can imagine how fuzzy that must have felt. I won’t get into our repeated appeals to Digg to explain our situation. What is important for the reader to know is that a much screwed up system is in effect at one of your most popular sites.
There have been claims and assumptions surrounding Digg in regard to a “bury crew” that was hiding submitted stories fro various reasons, one person told me that Digg buried submissions themselves based on certain criteria not specified but understood, and all kinds of mumbo jumbo in an effort to answer my questions about our exclusion from the information pool there.
Besides the obvious inequality system made apparent with today’s activity, there are deeper implications into these strange events. I would not even be telling you about them were it not for the fact that communities and people get hurt by these things. That’s right one of your communities gets hurt because of either stupidity or maliciousness on the part of others!
Partial Answer
I ran across a post by Kevin Rose on the Digg blog when I was doing some further reading, and was really shocked at what I saw. In a post from March 1st Rose specifically acknowledges the problem (which appears worse than I thought), and assures readers that something has been done to make the system better. Rose said, and I quote:
“We have tweaked some systems so that Digg is now able to be much more granular in the way it blocks offending content, so that Digg doesn’t necessarily need to block entire domains or subdomains. Apologies to any sites we’ve inconvenienced with our previous system.”
I am not sure exactly how difficult it would have been to rectify this situation, but I can only assume that they got so many emails from “domains” that they decided to blanket cover any that could find this post. So they knew all along that some people would get buried or excluded.
Math Can Hurt
It turns out that Digg has the capability ton analyze data that the average user is not aware of. I certainly was not at any rate, and I was somewhat stunned by the Matrix like way these people approach users. I guess it is to be expected from super geeks, but the message I got from all of this was not exactly a human one.
From what I can gather, this system is run by an algorithm that can and will surgically remove any domain or user automatically based on a set of variables and parameters. The screen shot I provide below illustrates exactly what you as a user represent to these people.
Conclusions
There is a reason no one ever answered those emails, and a reason Profy and other communities can be essentially excluded from their potential readers. Computers and math programs do not give a crap about people! Instead of having real people contact us or other people about problems, Rose had his people analyze freaking flow charts and high tech scatter grams. Then he issued an all points bulletin to everyone saying: “There may be a problem Houston, but we told Hal 9000 to do better!” The reason the top 10 Digger was contacted so fast was not because Digg cared about a human being or justice for that matter, the contact was likely because a huge blip (spike) appeared on the monitor showing 40 or 50 diggs in record time!
I hope everyone is as stupefied as I am about this, and watch tomorrow for my recommendations for alternatives to being considered a “copper top.”
Late Note: A CEO of another site who is a friend of mine also happens to be a programmer/developer. He emailed me and was upset that 1708 Diggs had been buried at Digg in a two hour period, that’s almost 25,000 in a day!